The Federal Aviation Administration mentioned on Thursday that it had opened an investigation into whether or not Boeing failed to make sure that its 737 Max 9 airplane was protected and manufactured to match the design accepted by the company.

The F.A.A. mentioned the investigation stemmed from the lack of a fuselage panel of a Boeing 737 Max 9 operated by Alaska Airways shortly after it took off on Friday from Portland, Ore., leaving a gap within the aspect of the passenger cabin. The airplane returned to Portland for an emergency touchdown.

“This incident ought to have by no means occurred, and it can’t occur once more,” the company mentioned.

In a letter to Boeing dated Wednesday, the F.A.A. mentioned that after the Portland incident, it was notified of extra points with different Max 9 planes. The letter doesn’t element what different points had been reported to the company. Alaska and United Airways, which function a lot of the Max 9s in use in the US, mentioned on Monday that they’d found free {hardware} on the panel when conducting preliminary inspections on their planes.

The brand new investigation is the newest setback for Boeing, which is one in every of simply two suppliers of enormous planes for many airways. The corporate has struggled to regain the general public’s belief after two crashes of 737 Max 8 jetliners, in Indonesia in 2018 and Ethiopia in 2019, killed a complete of 346 folks.

The Nationwide Transportation Security Board is investigating why the Max 9 panel, also called a door plug, flew off. The board is attempting to find out whether or not bolts that might have saved the panel from transferring and opening had been lacking or put in incorrectly. The plug is positioned the place an emergency exit could be if the airplane had the utmost variety of seats.

Nobody was critically harm within the incident, however aviation specialists have mentioned that if the panel had blown out when the airplane was at a better altitude, the implications might have been far more extreme. Passengers and flight attendants would have been strolling round and will have been unable to get again to their seats to placed on oxygen masks and safe their seatbelts. The Alaska Airline airplane was at about 16,000 ft and nonetheless climbing when the panel tore away.

Earlier than the announcement on Thursday, the F.A.A. had been working with Boeing on revising the corporate’s directions for inspecting 171 grounded Max 9 planes. The revision was introduced after Alaska and United Airways reported the free bolts.

“Boeing’s manufacturing practices must adjust to the excessive security requirements they’re legally accountable to satisfy,” the F.A.A. mentioned within the assertion saying the investigation.

Dave Calhoun, Boeing’s chief government, on Tuesday promised transparency within the firm’s response to the incident. He additionally mentioned the corporate was “acknowledging our mistake” with out explaining what he was referring to. Boeing has declined to elaborate on that comment.

“We’ll cooperate totally and transparently with the F.A.A. and the N.T.S.B. on their investigations,” Boeing mentioned in a press release.

United has 79 of the planes and Alaska has 65, however Alaska has had the greater share of cancellations from the grounding as a result of the Max 9 makes up 20 % of its fleet.

Arjun Garg, a former chief counsel and performing deputy administrator of the F.A.A., mentioned that by notifying Boeing of its investigation, the company had set in movement a course of that might lead to an enforcement motion towards the corporate. In different such instances, the F.A.A. has imposed fines and reached agreements requiring corporations to make adjustments to repair issues the regulators have recognized.

“In the end, the F.A.A. is considering folks being protected, not in accumulating penalties or something like that,” mentioned Mr. Garg, now a companion on the legislation agency Hogan Lovells in Washington. “They only wish to make the system safer.”

Some lawmakers are additionally asking whether or not the F.A.A. made errors.

Senator Maria Cantwell of Washington State, the Democrat who leads the Commerce Committee, requested the company on Thursday to supply the committee with an accounting of its administration of producers’ compliance with high quality management requirements.

“Briefly, it seems that F.A.A.’s oversight processes haven’t been efficient in guaranteeing that Boeing produces airplanes which might be in situation for protected operation, as required by legislation and by F.A.A. laws,” Ms. Cantwell mentioned within the letter to the company’s administrator, Mike Whitaker.

The F.A.A. declined to touch upon the senator’s letter, saying it might reply on to Ms. Cantwell.

A lawyer who represented the households of victims concerned within the Max 8 crashes, Mark Lindquist, mentioned the F.A.A. was being extra proactive than it had been up to now by rapidly opening an investigation. He mentioned the F.A.A. would take a much wider take a look at the Max 9 than the N.T.S.B., which goals to determine the reason for accidents and makes suggestions for the way they are often prevented.

“The tone of this announcement signifies the F.A.A. believes there was the potential for lack of life and the seriousness of the Boeing high quality management points,” Mr. Lindquist mentioned.

The F.A.A. needed to transfer rapidly as a result of it couldn’t afford to have vacationers worrying concerning the security of Boeing planes, mentioned Robert Mann, a former airline government who’s now an aviation business marketing consultant.

Mr. Mann mentioned the F.A.A. would in all probability take a hands-on strategy to inspecting the Max 9 planes because it did with the Max 8. He famous that Steve Dickson, who was the company’s administrator on the time and a former airline pilot, flew the Max 8 earlier than the F.A.A. allowed industrial flights on the jets in late 2020 after they had been grounded for practically two years.

“It is a recognition of a really longstanding downside and is a really public rebuke,” Mr. Mann mentioned.

The F.A.A.’s investigation gives a possibility for Boeing and the company to verify they’ve decided whether or not points with the Max 9 planes are remoted or systematic, mentioned Billy Nolen, a former performing administrator of the company. “That’s one thing they’ll know by the point they get by means of a few of these 171 plane,” he mentioned.

Mr. Nolen mentioned the F.A.A. is chargeable for ensuring each element of an plane meets the company’s requirements. The truth that airways have discovered free bolts on different Max 9 jets gives ample cause for the company to open an investigation.

Supply hyperlink